THE APPLICATION OF GAME THEORY, THE ART OF ACTIVISM STRATEGIES AND COMPETITIVE CREATIVITY IN POLITICS, GOVERNMENT, CORPORATE, INSTITUTIONAL AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTS


WARNING!


For governments, politician, bureaucrats, for board members, corporate managers, business executives, in fact for for anyone engaged in objectives pursuits, the true source of uncertainty for you individually, and collectively, lies in the intentions of others, whom you may know of, or others you do not, beyond your awareness and horizon.


Kevin Beck
engages
in the art of strategy development, implementation, change, competition and influence
beyond awareness, beyond horizon.


Go to the strategy
in action now




Document, and article distribution, count for outgoing communications
... click here to go to the Forum



Can you discern the
purpose and power
of the Mosaic Portal?


Why is this site called "Dance". Simple really, it is a metaphor.

A process requiring the target/s to expend attention, time, resources, money and energy, on countering something where they rarely know the source of the action. Deploying a multilayered strategy of technology and human networks and interaction. The dance is also a manipulation, funded on, among other things, the other party's vested interests, desires, ego, goals and methodologies. In the words of corporate lexicon this is an expansion of "game theory".

Political parties, corporations, enterprises, institutions and individuals rarely engage in comprehensive and deep "intelligence and information" gathering and they are often unsuspecting when you come out of left field. The more grandiose your pronouncements the more they tend to dismiss them.

Kevin Beck and his associates employ methodologies designed to identify potential, and/or existing influences, that may be used to create barriers, or influencesa dna ctivities that can assist or oppose. They seek out the hidden influences in communities and countries, and sometimes across the world. The Game Theory described here largely relies on the insular nature of the individual in their own world of work and living.

In large powerful enterprises, institutions and bureaucratic structures, human behaviour, attitude, awarness and vigilance, is predominantly shaped by the environment. Human nature often applies self perception and personal intuition over logic. People today have an inordinate belief in their inate abilities. This may have come to supercede education and learning. Skills and competencies are placed above lateral and deeper thinking capacity. The targets are easy pickings.

Most peoples' power is limited to their work or office and their ability to direct within their own environment. Employees, particularly in governments, public sector enterprises, political parties, and corporations tend to be programmed by the perceived power/size of the entity, the ruels, systems, procedures and the person who affects their everyday lives and perceptions. Julian Assange, and Wikileaks, is a glaring example of how an individual can make others, often perceived to be more powerful, dance.This may be Assange's aim over anything to do with public interest and values.


Good strategists operate effectively for their clients, largely unseen and unknown, leaving disparate clues from time to time buried within the Mosaic. (Kevin R Beck, Melbourne Australia, "Power and Influence, Beyond Everyday Awareness, 2012")



what is the objective? ....click here



Do you know, and understand, the Theory of Influence?


Do you know, and understand, Black Box Theory?

A FORMULA FOR SUCCESS


If you want to influence, challenge and preempt many political, government and corporate, strategies and obejctives then resort to policy analysis and ideas, research and deep analytical arguments because many of the the modern enterprises, and governments, have adopted within its operational, and decision making, structures a public relations and media management model, more focused on short term goals and reactive stances. A type of crisis management, or manipulation tool, designed to shape perception.

Add to this a loss of deep ongoing education, skills and experience that now permeates public services, institutions and corporations. Couple this policy, and research, implementation and a focus on their lack of experience, with all the modern tools of human networks, relationships, management and communication.

Tap the self interest of many and use that to effect. Be prepared to mix carrot and stick. Many who try to negotiate with government, and bureaucracy, who want to change things, influence or challenge, fear retribution and put up with losing or wasting money or simply missing out. They will simply say that is the system and you cannot beat it. Everyday we see this not only in politics but also in commerce. The large retail chains use moral suasion and implied tactics, buying power and inherent but unstated threats to manage suppliers. You want to deal with Coles or Woolworths then you will comply with their systems, repack your products to their specification and generally dance to their tune. It is highly improbable that suplliers will organise and run a political, and public, campaign or present a case in the federal court, to break up Woolworths and Coles domination of the Australian food, grocery, building products, liquor and fuel markets, in the public interest.


CONTINUALLY GATHERING INFORMATION, SECRETS, COMPETITIVE RESEARCH,
OPINION AND DATA,
BEYOND THE HORIZON OF
AWARENESS.


It is stored here...



A MODEL FOR PROGRESSIVELY HANGING THE PARLIAMENTS OF AUSTRALA


The political elite, within Australia, in the labor and liberal parties, who have held democracy, government and public administration, at every level, captive for decades are entering a new paradigm in Australia as their world of known structures, power and influences, morph into a world where they simply cannot understand what is happening to them.


election 2010 how to vote Federal Parliament
and State Parliament(1) - and State Parliament (2) - and State Parliament (3)

.. the end result ongoing...



Are you trying to monitor visitors to my web sites? Good luck, there are many doorways and some require log in, and registration, acting as breakers to tracking. People can go in and out the Mosaic Portal.

It is not about how many people visit the hundreds of my Mosaic Portal sites, it is about the number of communications, and distributions, the diversity of the utilties, the volume of material that is going out, the content of the distribution, to where, to whom and
why?


All of that cannot be tracked!


Counter DIGITS.com: All networked sites, forums and blogs owned by Kevin R Beck, incoming and outgoing content

Privacy Policies
The Mosaic Portal does not collect personal information.

Love great music?..click here






Go ahead challenge me.. click



There are clues scattered through the content of the web sites of the Mosaic Portal.

Einstein Every day the tools of the Mosaic Portal trawl the web, searching for content. The owner of the Mosaic Portal, Kevin R Beck, operates in a network of diversity, interacting, and meeting, with people in many walks of life, here in Australia and internationally.

Out of discussions, communications and research, articles, analysis and predictions are constructed. When it is about business objectives the strategies are assembled and
deployed.

Across the content of the Mosaic Portal network, and in day to day real life working activity, policy, and action, issues are questioned. Matters raised with politicians, governments, corporations, boards, investors, interest groups and individuals. tactics are implemented. The Australian social and economic landscape is assessed, predicted and, where there is a benefit to be obtained or a client to be served, they are impacted.

the eagle sees all ... The ability to predict is the realm of the Futurist

According to Tetlock's anyone's predictions are just as likely to come true or be off the mark as any of the expert predictions. One can only hope that through ongoing learning, observation, comparison, evaluation and measurement, reading and listening to the views of others one might minimise the probability, and continuance, of always being wrong. You be the judge.

SCRIPTING IS USED TO CONSTANTLY UPDATE CONTENT, SO ENABLE YOUR BROWSER

The utilities of the Mosaic Portal are free to use.





How to research corporations




Dancing With Identity
Policing made hard in Australia



September 2010: Well what happened Ms Gillard, you and Mr Abbott wanted to play but it looks like you lose, we win? Who are "we"?
Thanks for playing. Bring on your 2010 - 2012 team.


AUSTRALIA FEDERAL ELECTION 2010: GAME ON MS GILLARD SAYS
SO LET'S BUST THE POLITICAL DUOPOLY

Click: for How To Vote, in your seat, at the 2010 Australian Federal Election


New dance partners, a new tango, hello all you politicians, and candidates, of the 2010 federal and state (Victorian) elections, come dance with the devil in the pale moonlight. We are the shadowy orchestrators, and strategists, operating, communicating and influencing, beyond the horizon of the local politician, their staff and their advisers. We are about to deliver a hung parliament at the federal election of 2010.

Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard
will blow their 2010 election chances. The political activists, reformists, the technology and the potential are now of a size to have an impact on the outcome.


We should accept no more the substandard governance, the waste and self interest, the disregard for our place except at election time, we should no longer accept the corruption and rank behaviour, lack of ethics and domination of our parliaments by the duopoly. It is time to vote Greens and Independents
into both houses of Australia's federal parliament and shake it up.



TIME TO CULL THE MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT



TIME TO CULL THE MEMBERS OF THE VICTORIAN PARLIAMENT

cartoons courtesy of Sangrea: click




tell KEVINRBECK Tell me about your member of parliament, (state, territory and/or federal), your gripes and concerns, their performance, tell me about the behaviour of political and public officials. Your local campaigns gossip, interests, activism, how you will vote, concerns in yur community.








Click Here to Join the Distribution Forum and Tools





Journalism Resources Toolbox



Media Distribution Services Toolbox





EXAMINING POLITICAL, AND CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR
REPRESENTATION, GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC SERVICE
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

KEVIN R BECK HARNESSING WEB TECHNOLOGY, AND HUMAN NETWORKS
FOR IMPACT DELIVERY WITHIN THE LEGAL BOUNDARIES OF POLITICAL, AND CORPORATE, ACTIVISM - BEYOND THE HORIZON.


You are within a framework that encompasses many complex strategies.


The development of the mosaic.


Developed for personal objectives and for clients, and associates, through the application, and implementation, of technology, research, human interaction, behavioual sub systems and game theory.

Enter the world of a lateral thinker and explore.
KEVIN R BECK's Mosaic.



Custom Search



THE KEVIN R BECK TOOL BOX FOR SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ACTIVISM
Uses multifaceted techniques, including technology, communication theory, research, behavioural and organisational theories, assessment, analysis and intuition.

Almost all toil in their work, political, corporate and institutional offices, detached from the world beyond their own experience and awareness. They are oblivious of those beyond their horizons.



The owner of this web site Kevin R Beck, provides free resources for many activities of interest. Within the web sites are specific ones that set out issues, ideas and actions that are seen as important in Australian communities, society, eonomy, media, business, government and bureaucracy. This, and many of the mosaic Portal web sites, describe within their content strategies, and actions, that span decades. The mosaic is not merely on the web, it is a mix of technology, internet and human networks. . Things that by themselves may appear innocent, unremarkable, irrelevant or not seen, or known, by others are often predicted within the mosaic., well in advance of them occurring or becoming public knowledge.
PMA, where practitioners of strategy, and lateral thinking, can be found




My World My Space



ARE YOU GULLIBLE?

"One of the more sophisticated methods for influencing legislators is a practice known as 'grasstops' communications. In this, the PR agency will carefully identify the peer group of the target legislator or 'opinion former'. They will then hire one or more members of that group, friends or acquaintances of the target, to informally promote the PR message within the group - a 'district liaison'. In this way the agency aims to create for the target the artificial impression that 'everyone is talking about it' and that there is strong community support for the issue. With this method, legislators may not even realise that they are being lobbied." (Source: PR and Government, the Corporate Watch, http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=1571)

The grass roots concept of people activism can be seen in the web activities of disparate individauls creating a web pattern in accordance with the principles enunciated within a framework like the Mosaic Portal's tool kit for activism sewt out below.

Several million individuals across Australia collectively referred to as Mad as Hell


Technology designed to communicate to, and interact with, politicians, governments, public officials, executives at every level in corporations, associations, institutions, communities, interest groups and individuals across the web. An activist utility.


If this section is blank turn your active content on.




Forum and Blog Article Archives
Distribution Utilities


the evangelical web


Bishop Echevarria
OPUS DEI

"Opus Dei is a Catholic institution founded by Saint Josemaría Escrivá. Its mission is to help people turn their work and daily activities into occasions for growing closer to God, for serving others, and for improving society. Opus Dei complements the work of local churches by offering classes, talks, retreats and pastoral care that help people develop their personal spiritual life and apostolate."




The content, of this site, unless otherwise attributed, is authored by Kevin R Beck, Melbourne Australia. It is catalogued by Google and simultaneously distributed by the utilities of the Mosaic Portal Forum on DelphiForums. The distribution is targeted to a particular audience through direct email lists. Distribution is at individual, regional, state, national or international by country and is not limited to Australia.

The principles of activism outlined here adopt many styles including the commercial business approach. If we do not get a reaction initially we will persist and broaden the
strategy.


What is the dance? Creating the strategy elements Things to consider Players Want a strategist?


IMPORTANT every portal page uses scripting to update content. So turn your active content on.




KEVINRBECK commentary writings Click on image



Political, Corporate, Social and Economic is here


ANTI EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME CAMPAIGN


The Australian Labor Government, proposed Emission Trading Scheme will create economic, and social, upheaval across Australia. It will increase prices for goods and sevices quite dramatically. The price of electricity will sky rocket. It will go well above the predicted increase per household,

" Emissions Trading Scheme will cost Australian families $1100 a year, By John Rolfe From: The Daily Telegraph, The Daily Telegraph November 25, 2009".

The woner of this web site predicts that the price wil be closer to $A2,000 per annum. The government's claim of providing compensation is spurious since the cost of the required actual compensation is not known. The government is plucking numbers out of constructed, and engineered, models. The base argument that we need an ETS because of global warming is spurious. The moral imperative according to Mr Rudd, which again according to Mr Rudd, is based on indisputable
climate science does not exist as the labor Ministers state it to be and they are being selective.

The foundation of science, that is pessimism has been adandoned in favour of courting political approval and funds.Thus the proposed Australian Emission Trading Scheme has to be killed off in 2010.The
campaign to do this will begin in August 2009, prior to the Copenhagen Conference and it will gain pace, across Australia, in February 2010 as the legislation is prepared for resubmissio0n to parliament. The campiagn will be in disparate groups and locations as well as orchestrtaed in major interest spheres.

Information will be provided to politicians opposing the scheme and to small and medium businesses, to community groups, to regional and local newaspapers and into areas such as the Hunter Valley and Latrobe Valley, Port Kembla and into Queensland's coal regions where the impact will be on employment and economy. The arguments of the Rudd labor government and those specifically engineered out of the federal Department of Climate Change will be unpacked and critiqued, and these papers will be distrbuted across web sites and blogs here in Australia and internationally. They will be loaded to
Forums and distributed, using javascripting as headlines onto hundreds of web sites.


USE THE TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE THE TOOLS OF SPIN DOCTORS AND MARKETERS

Joseph Turow summarizes how marketers are using new technologies to make it "harder than ever for audiences to escape, and resist, their advances."

One practice, "seeding," blends "publicity, product placement, and public relations." Seeding can involve hiring actors for "clandestine campaigns that 'may consist of seeding chat rooms, blogs and forums with paid-for messages,'" as one marketer explained. A Weber Shandwick executive described the goal as to "enlist, equip and harness the power of trusted, informed and credible messengers." Another tool, "behavioral targeting," allows marketers to customize online ads, depending on Web pages visited and searches performed.

The cookies track, "registration data, your movements on their site, and even information about you that they've purchased from a third party" are also be available to marketers. Offline examples of behavioral targeting include customizable cable TV commercials and convenience store coupons.
SOURCE: Boston Globe, August 27, 2006
For more information or to comment on this story, visit PR Watch:
Go to PR Watch


DEBUNKING THE SCIENCE, AND ECONOMICS, USED BY LABOR TO JUSTIFY THE ETS & CPRS


Climate change theory, an imprecise set of scientific arguments is driving the labor government policy. But not to care, the government is happy to alows pin and untruths to serve their agenda and purpose. So let is practice it back at them.

This policy is deeply flawed and based on propositions that are not true, or are manipulated, to create and justify the outcome, the government wants. There is nothing wrong with reducing carbon emissions to clean the environment but an ETS is not necessarily the bst way to go about it.

The public service is not doing its job. The parliament is not doing its job and will be galvanised, firstly through the demotion of Malcolm Turnbull, in late 2009, and then via a set of carefully planned and implemented strategies in 2010. Additional ammmunition will be provided to the opponents, of the ETS, and the government will be thwarted in its objectives.

Kevin Rudd is effectively gaming the nation's futrure on an ideological belief.


If Kevin Rudd and the labor party in Australia's federal government go ahead with their planned carbon reduction scheme (ETS) scheduled for 2010 they will wreck Australia's economy and leave a mark more indelible than the recession Australia had to have under former labor Prime Minister, Paul Keating.



Archive article: The seeds of Rudd's climate change debacle. Brendan Nelson, may be a bumbling liberal party leader but essentially he is right in trying to preach caution and block labor's moves. Rudd's team are the sheep, following the latest fad, at the front of the pack who will blindly run over the cliff taking the gullible voters with them. Every crack pot theory and activist is now given oxygen, and the debate is clowded and we cannot hold the government to a serious accontable debate. It is now imperative, as never before, that those with the capacity to resist, and block, engage Kevin Rudd and the labor government, the Greens and the greenies, and ideologs, in a war of attrition like no other ever seen in the nation before.

This is not about politics and simple resistance or activism. This is about survival economically and socially, defying the efforts, and actions, of people who colllectively have never created anything. They are theorists and academics. politicians of zeal and ideology whose beliefs, and passions, are extremely dangerous. Out to save a world that does not need saving. They are not experts, in any shape or form, and they have never accurately
predicted anything. They have at their disposal a public service, detached from reality, commissioned to serve. This public service is imbued with the code of serving the government of the day without question. They serve Ministers whose backgrounds, experiences and credentials, are not diverzse and congisant of the peril to whihc they are takin g us. We must draw on our own experiences and resources to resist, block and if necessary destroy their resolve and strategies. If the Rudd labor government spends a million or more on advertising their view points about the ETS (carbon reduction) then they should also fund counter opinions in the interest of the nation.



The tool box of strategy and game play




  1. First do your homework. carry out the research constantly. Check to find similar interested individuals, groups, businesses and institutions. If it is political examine the players, the members of governments or electorates, and research their background, performance and interests. Also look at legislation, trade agreements and international treaties and laws. Maybe you can find an enforcement tool or crack in their armour.


  2. Gather target lists - names, addresses (mail and email), for business, politics, government, these lists can be bought


  3. Reserach the background, using newspapers, Google and information tools from agencies whihc sell intelligence materials


  4. Break lists and people, business and other down into interest categories. In the case of politicians examine their parliamentary roles and committee memberships


  5. Read any public comments, papers or speeches and other relevant sources involving the list members


  6. Visit their electorates, their localities, their business and learn about their operations, positions and the attitudes of people affected by them


  7. If you are opposing an action, seeking to influence or create barriers, create small descriptive files for each list member and then decide whether you will write press releases, white papers or articles


  8. Distribute these materials to internet interest lists, blogs, to media journalists and onto the media web sites and to the electorates and across relevant parliaments


  9. Small local and regional newspapers often look for different content and will publish articles on special interest items that relate to their readers


  10. Present strong cogent arguments, references and aim them at the target constituency


  11. If the action is political ramp up your efforts, communications and activity during the lead up to elections


  12. Maintain regular contact with the public service at federal, state and territory levels


  13. Distribute your materials to members of parliament


  14. Distribute your material to relevant parliamentary committee members


  15. Lodge submissions with Standing Committees of the houses of parliament in Australia


  16. Lodge submissions with specific and relevant parliamentary enquiry committees


  17. Post the above submissions on web sites and/or blogs


  18. If the issue is local then the effort should be local, if it has wider ramifications such as climate change, economies, legal, immigration and such then go wide to the world media, to world parliaments and other outlets such as conferences, meetings and associations.


  19. Create multiple blogs, web sites and forums and "chinese wall" them so that the traffic cannot be discerned.


  20. Publish your white papers and articles onto these websites and distribute to audiences - public sector, private sector, associations and journalists by category of publication and interest


  21. You use your agenda expansively, interlinking it into other similar agendas to grow your distribution, and impact, base.


  22. Link your agenda/issue to a powerful interest such as business


  23. For greater impact you have to be prepared to spend time, resources and money.



The most effective method of competitive action is to attack the target's objectives, their financial funding and resource deployment base and their methodologies and systems of calculation and decision making through multifaceted strategies.


ANOTHER KEVINRBECK WEB SITE ON THE MOSAIC PORTAL NETWORK


BROAD BASED INFORMATION, TOOLS AND IDEAS


Every day content seekers, and agents, enter the Mosaic Portal web sites extracting materials for distribution, for use in their own content, for educational and research purposes and much more. This content, provided free of charge to users, is posted on web sites and into hard print media articles and press releases, and is used in targeted mass circulation emails, and campaigns, in Australia, in the United States and sometimes internationally. A multipath communication network is being established, maintained and expanded. This, and other motivations, mesh to create the catalyst for the dance.

What will you do when I unexpectedly come to dance in your sector with a intricate plan? How will you, your staff, your employees or constituents react? Will they comprehend the extent of the challenge and the road down which they may go, the cost and resources involved? Will they be deisive, defensive or dismissive or will they see the big picture and the possibilities? Will they learn that it is better often not to entice people to react? Will they carry out a SWOT analysis of threats? What are the ramifications, motivation or intent of people who may initiate action or activism?

Today ()2009) there are new paradigms affecting the world of politics, government and business. Here there are lessons for others. The dance upon which lateral thinkers can take organisations (public and private) or individuals is quite dramatic and often unexpected. Take for example this case:

"Australian Paralympian 'dragged himself on to plane after forced to check in wheelchair'

Australian Paralympic champion Kurt Fearnley has received an apology from the budget airline Jetstar after staff removed his wheelchair forcing him to drag himself across the floor of a busy airport. The 28-year-old, who won the marathon gold at both the Athens and Beijing games, hauled himself through Brisbane Airport and onto the plane when the company – an offshoot of the Australian flag carrier Qantas – said his specially adapted wheelchair had to be checked into the hold. Fearnley, who had just completed a gruelling 60 mile trek through the Papua New Guinea jungle, was offered the use of an airline wheelchair, but refused claiming it was an insult to his independence." (Source: By Martin Evans Published: 9:13PM GMT 25 Nov 2009, UK Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/6654946/Australian-Paralympian-dragged-himself-on-to-plane-after-forced-to-check-in-wheelchair.html)


The Jetstar management failure to have a relevant anticipatory policy in place, and the action of the relevant employee, no doubt did not anticipate the fallout as Mr Furnley contacted the Australian media. This story went wrldwide on the internet. An individual can create an email alert off this topic using Google tools - allowing a person to monitor every reportage of this incidence anywhere in the world and use that documentation to further an issue - http://www.google.com.au/alerts?um=1&cf=all&ned=au&hl=en&q=kokoda+wheelchair+Jet+star&t=1&source=news&cd=2) The archilles heel of many corporations is the attitude of their employees that the employer's systems and procedures take precedence over all else.

The changed dynamics, due to technology access in the hands of the individual and the group, has been extensively reported in the media, in parliaments and has been the product of discussions in many board rooms for many, many years. However, quite often, the journalists, commentators and the advisers and consultants have no idea who plays beyond their horizons. They have no idea that strategies put in place several years ago are now active and
in play. Many different strategies across many parts of industry and society. Everyday more are being created and put into play.

Contact our multiskilled talented professionals to discuss services, campaigns, assignments and business.

Not everything people do is work related. Some of it has public, and community, interest, some things they undertake to see if they can reach into governments, business and enterprises, anywhere. Some things I do because I am motivated. Maybe they want to challenge other's abilities, to create a high stakes game.



The proposition that an individual may be motivated to directly, or indirectly, impact parts of an organisation even changing some aspects of its interaction in society and economy might be novel or foreign to them. The above example caused Jetstar management to imemdiately change their original response from "puzzlement" to a chnage of policy and behaviour. It took a high profile person to motivate Jetstar. This says a lot about vthe company's attitudes to ordinary (low profile) customers.

The application of
game theory to industry, to business, to competition, activism and interest using the tools, and resources, of the


WHAT IS THE MOSAIC PORTAL?

The Personal Web Site of KEVINRBECK
Privacy Statement, Uses and Motivation


No Count Available
All KEVINRBECK sites, blogs and forums
How many people will we send stuff to, communicate or interact with, today or tomorrow?


CONSTANTLY UPDATING CONTENT



IMPORTANT every portal page uses scripting to update content. So turn your active content on.




WHAT IS THE DANCE?


The Dance is what I call a game play orchestrated in a particular arena of activity - political, government, corporate and/or community. It is when The dance comes about when someone takes a company, an executive, a bureaucrat or other person and directly, or indirectly, deposits them (metaphorically speaking) into a complex problem or within the hornet's nest of a political environment, inside a contrived, or existing, public issue or a sensitive and charged emotive environment.

" Grech's torrent of gushing advice to Turnbull

JACOB SAULWICK NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT, November 26, 2009

GODWIN GRECH was attempting to collude on fees paid to an investment banker, while styling himself as an intimate adviser to the Liberal leader, Malcolm Turnbull. A report into the so-called ''Utegate'' affair outlines extensive links between Mr Grech and Mr Turnbull, John Howard's former chief of staff Arthur Sinodinos, and also John O'Sullivan, the head of investment banking at Credit Suisse and the husband of The Australian's Janet Albrechtsen. The report shows Malcolm Turnbull made contact at least 30 times with Mr Grech, a man who referred to Barack Obama as ''the Black Jesus'', described Treasury as ''left-wing loony,'' and offered numerous column ideas to Ms Albrechtsen. There were at least 22 emails and eight phone calls or messages between Mr Grech and Mr Turnbull from November 2008 to late June 2009. There were another 88 email exchanges with other senior Liberal identities from September 2008, according to the Senate privileges committee report, tabled last night in Parliament.(Source: Sydney Morning Herald, http://www.smh.com.au/national/grechs-torrent-of-gushing-advice-to-turnbull-20091125-jrwi.html)

The outcome effect is that an organisation's management's attention and resources, is extensively diverted. This is effectively what happened in the Godwin Grech case. There are other examples.


Hetty Johnston, living in Australia, deposited the artist Bill Henson, the NSW Police Service, the Premier of NSW and the Prime Minister of Australia in a political, and community, hornets nest over Bill Henson's pictures, of naked young girls and boys. It may be a diversion or focused, deliberate impact seeking an outcome. Ms Johnston is adept at the very technqiues described in this web site. In being adept she herself, and her group, become a useful utility. Another example of the dance is the political activist group Get Up. Though they have lesss impact.

The Dance is a set of strategies for subjecting politicians in their daily activity, or in elections to specific exposure. It is also used to subject corporate executives to external forces and interactions or to exert pressure on politicians. Get Up (http://www.getup.org.au/) is one such example where like minded participants use high technology to give effect.

In the world of governments, people tend to think conventionally and say "they will give their vote to someone else" in the next election. This is largely meaningless to a politician unless you can actually unseat the incumbent. One has to reach much wider. If you want to bring down a business venture then you may have to blend a whole mosaic.

"Plans to build magnesium smelter in Qld on verge of collapse" - The World Today - Tuesday, 27 May , 2003 Reporter: Louise Willis HAMISH ROBERTSON: Plans to build a $1.5 billion magnesium smelter in Central Queensland are again on the verge of collapse. Only last year, the project's owners, Australian Magnesium Corporation, managed to prop up their decade-old development proposal with a $300 million injection from the Queensland and Federal Governments. But now, as Louise Willis reports, the AMC says it needs a new financial backer for the project to survive. LOUISE WILLIS: When first unveiled, the AMC magnesium project was hailed as an enormous economic shot in the arm for Central Queensland, not to mention Australia. But recently the project has been plagued by financial worries. Two years ago AMC failed to raise the $650 million initially needed to construct the smelter. Last year, the Queensland and Federal Governments each offered $150 million, claiming it was vital the project proceed. This year, AMC has admitted major cost over-runs, and Australia's corporate watchdog – the Australian Securities Commission – is looking into the matter. The company now admits it needs more help to survive." (Source: ABC The World Today)

The compay did not survive the competitor's hit. The politicians, the community and the corporation's executives, had been taken on a merry dance across Australia and the world. Vested interests, the banks sealed the fate. Who influenced their decision against the wishes, collective might and wisdomn, and economic claims of all of the powerful supporters?
In 1997 the Minister for Education, Senator Amanda Vanstone, was embroiled in a scandal where some $A2,200,000 of government funds were put at risk by her department. There was a Senate enquiry and court cases. The Senator unfortunatley was a political casualty. Who orchestrated her dance card and the strategy elements? Who recovered $A1,75087,000 of the money that the private recipients of grants took off the Department?

Between the years 1991 - 1994 the State Electricity Commission of Victoria was privatised in an environment of political and union opposition. One union, the Australia Services Union Energy Branch, was instrumental in devlivering the outcomes. Why did this union branch stand out from twenty three other unions in the state? Who orchestrated the dance card? The strategy, and its unit elements, is reported in parliamentary records and media archives.
Who can have a major supermarket raided by food and regulatory inspectors? Who can influence a Senate enquiry into telecommunications, and the objectives of Telstra or Optus, and how is this done? What else can be orchestrated by knowlegeable, and creative, people?

Not so smart

Heard About Smart Cards?




CREATING THE SCHEMATIC AND THE DANCE STEPS


The techniques, and plans, are deployed internally within an organisation or system, externally or both, concurrently. They are employed internally by communicating to the Board, the management, a regulatory body or some other person or entity that has influence inside the organisatioon or the target's world of work and interest. A public, consumer, media, board, management, political or other focus is brought to bear on individuaols within an entity. It may include analysis and research. It might include distributing economic or social evaluation papers critiquing the performance or activity of the person or organisation. Distribution of these papers goes to interested parties such as banks, financiers, legislators, the media etc. This activity forms a mosaic, a complex strategy. Some practitioners earn their livelihood from creating and implementing the dance, others do it for a hobby and for fun and some do it for the public interest. They might do it to level the playing field in an environment where people are facing a greater resourced and ruthless competitive enterprise or a stubborn bureaucracy.

The tactic is to attach responsibility, accountability or perceived negative outcomes to the person's work environment.

The modern executive, politician and bureaucrat, likes to avoid accountability and likes to deflect to someone else. The person in charge usually does not like unexpected intrusions into their world of work and fiefdoms or questions and challenges to their authority or personal esteem and self image. Of course some are so bound up in their own world that they cannot see the nose on their face until it bites.

In the KEVINRBECK Mosaic Portal reside numerous examples, and demonstrations, of all of the above motivations. You just have to look for them. If I
pointed to all of them that would be too easy.


Deep inside their shiny headquarters the management, and advisers, of Australia's major corporate, and public sector, enterprises plan and execute their elaborate strategies. They tell their boards, shareholders and customers, governments and the general public how good their strategies are and what the future will be.





Things to consider when getting the strategy together.


  1. Research the background of your target


  2. Note the local environment if they are a politician or a business. Do this in the context of the political party or enterprise, the government or the board etc.


  3. Look for attached or competing inteests such as other political party members, local media, community groups, business competitors


  4. Frame your issue and present it factually as a logical argument with detials and if appropriate source documents etc.


  5. You might consider involving a regulatory agency such as Fair Trading, State Consumet Affairs agencies or the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.


  6. If it is a political exercise consider using the parliamentary standing committees relevant to the domain of your issue. You might add in the regulatory agency and also the department/s of the relative state, territory or federal government.


  7. Prepare your distribution lists. These can be local, regional, national and even international. In the latter case remember some business and all governments interact internationally. So do institutions, public servants and other entities.


  8. Visit the local area and gather information.


  9. If it is a political exercise allocate the resources. If you have funds spend part of them on targeted activity such as advertising, supporting local interests who can bring pressure and influence.


  10. Attach the issue or activity to a person to engender accountability, responsibility or response


  11. Build, maintain and expand the networks of technology and human interaction



If you want to dance with a corporation or give it a light, or mighty, whack


  1. Research the background of your target


  2. Examine any public interest issues in their market power, operations or foot print. Is there an environmental or hot button of that type?


  3. Research if there are any political arguments, enquiries and committee reports on the sector of your target


  4. Pick and frame your strategic issue and present it factually as a logical argument with detials and if appropriate source documents etc. See the Break Up Telstra argument at Consuming Australia


  5. Tell the company that you are in the game and why they are the centre of your attention.

    Seek out common interests, individuals and groups.

    Post your material onto chosen web sites that may have an interest.

    Tell the
    media. Make sure you arouse their interest and you might select a particular journalist/s, in your country and internationally perhaps.

    if the company is listed on the stock exchange or of it privately held, it may be global. Then the matter may well be of interest to shareholders, financiers and the market.


  6. Write to parliamentary members if your research shows they have an interest such as in utilities, electricity, telecommunications, food and grocery, fuel etc.

    Attach your issue, argument and/or recemdation, to their electorate, or portfolio, interest.

    If applicable make a submission to a Minister and/or a parliamentary enquiry.

    Make a submission to a consumer or legal interest group.


  7. Prepare your distribution lists. These can be local, regional, national and even international. In the latter case remember some business and all governments interact internationally. So do institutions, public servants and other entities.


  8. Visit the local area and gather information.


  9. If it is a business exercise allocate the resources. If you have funds spend part of them on targeted activity such as advertising, supporting local interests who can bring pressure and influence.


  10. It is the same for all classes of activism and targets. Attach the issue or activity to a person to engender accountability, responsibility or response


  11. Build, maintain and expand the networks of technology and human interaction grwoing them exponentially. Keep the pressure up.



SOME VEHICLES

Technology is empowering. It enables individuals, and interest groups, to find, and reach, the same audiences that are the executives within, the targets of politicians, corporations, enterprise and small business and the constituents.

board members,


consumers,


governments and politicians


shareholders, media and the general public


The methods by which the media, business and governments identify players, influencers, potential problem makers or people who can impact eventsa nd outcomes have been traditional in nature. There has been a focus on individuals, minority and other interests, such as unions, becoming shareholders and attending board meetings. There has been a move by superannuation investment funds to note their members interests and views when dealing with corporations in which they have invested. There has been a focus on interest groups.

However the greater number of people, within corporations, seem to be oblivious to a whole different class of threats to the objectives of their enterprise, they work and exist beyond their horizons. When they do appear they are viewed in isolation of history or potential.
What if they are actually competitors to the objective? It is a new, and as yet unobserved and little reported threat. It is the lateral thinker using technology. It is someone who is a member of the corporate world. In concert with any or all of these may be a web activist, given greater potential by the sheer capability of emerging technologies, coupled with the ability of the individual to harness and deploy it, within a set of complex, intertwined strategies. to bring about the sought after objectives. It is a sophisticated application of the tools that the corporations, and governments, use - game theory. The threat to the status quo of political and corporate incumbency, influence and outcomes by well developed information and communication distribution. The web activist enjoys the challenge of dealing with the "corporate and political spin doctors."

This intervention into corporate, political and social arenas comes from the free lance, self motivated, and unemotional, interest. The individual with no apparent history, or role, in the particular sector. Is it true that
all decision makers are known, or at the very least observable? They can be, but only if a very sophisticated research and intelligence gathering system is deployed.




the evangelical web
Use effective communication techniques



Build networked web sites,
with live, solid content of interest, and cross link them to others



Manipulating the consumer of everything

Adopting corporate techniques


WHO IS A PLAYER?

Today those who can impact someone's world often exist beyond the horizon of awareness. If they are known they may be under estimated. Their issue may be viewed in isolation.

The real players can be quite challenging even dangerous. They want, need and like, to
play in the game of their choosing for the sport of it, perhaps the challenge, or for the money or for a cause. Their motivations are often powerful, resilient and ongoing..

Issues facing governments and corporations can be used as underlying platforms of action by these activists, interested in entering the arena. They are a mix of technology and human netwoks.

Represented here they are specific web sites, articles and analysis distributed to competing interests (politicians, opposition parliamentarians and competitor businesses), to persons, or groups, that have direct, or peripheral, interests (politicians, business people, community members, association members, anyone) and to institutions and media that are monitoring the situation or environment.

Advisers and decision makers are oblivious because the pattern over time and issue has not been established or discerned. Their "intelligence gathering" is flawed or non existing. There are no cohesive tracking and linking systems within governments, agencies and enterprises, generally. Too often their employees are inexperienced and under trained. They have no idea of the triggers or likely consequences of ignoring or dismissing a communcation or misinterpreting or generally beinh unaware.

The Mosaic Portal, and similar technology creations, may be used to increase pressure or open up new directions. Look at the Australian Wheat Board issue for example. The owner of this Portal communicates with members of the US Congress, US media and to wheat communities across the United States of America. Australian governments, and corporate executives, eventually must come to realise that their world is not an isolated fiefdom where they can do, and behave, as they wish.

The objectives of web activists are varied. In the case of the
Kevin R Beck Mosaic Portal the primary objective is to demonstrate what can trigger political, and corporate action, and response. There are examples in the many pages of the Kevin R Beck web sites of the agenda being identified, shaped and implemented. One only has to understand and utilise machine, media, corporate, government and human interests and systems, customers and vested interests effectively. Look at this example.

Carefully placed and directed communications, articles and research can generate a response. The generation of proposals, ventures, alliances, using work related activities can all add to the Mosaic. Using web communication technology, people from diverse background, and motivations, can unexpectedly enter the arena. Yet employees and managers and executives, politicians and the greater number of people are oblivious. The Kevin R Beck Mosaic Portal has different tools and utilities, allowing any user to operate at arms length from their work environment or their target. Put bluntly it is a powerful tool in the hands of a competent user who has knowledge and ideas. It can be used to orchestrate the dance.

Want to meet the strategist who created this vehicle?


The KEVINRBECK Mosaic Portal is but one elment in a complex set of capabilities, tools and networks. Clients employ Kevin R Beck in many sectors of Australian business activity whilst others seek him out for public interest or altruistic causes or assistance.
Click here for the services overview.


More news >>

Powered by Newsfeed Maker





What are the objectives, what are the motivations?

The objective, or the motivations, for intervention into others' arenas need not be commercial, it can be citizenship participation or political in nature. The strategy may be to intertwine commercial and political interests. Persons, or events and outcomes, may be manipulated without anyone realising that a complex strategy is being implemented. This was the case in the Queensland Magnesium case listed above.

Technology empowers the individual to send their messages out. Research, networks and information play a big role in their tactics. The web has literally set them free.

They may be employed by a traditional competitor to your sphere of activity, or someone who has an interest in it. Think laterally as to what the definition of a competitor might actually be. Employment assignments are not necessary to galvanise their participation. They may be zealots, free lancers or committed people, funding their own activities and research, web and technology tools developments. The motivations as to why they act, intervene and cause you to respond, and expend your resources, are complex and diverse. They will invariably leave a trail, because they want you to know they are there. They may even send you a communication. All too often your employees will simply delete and ignore those communications. They are oblivious to people beyond their immediate horizons. The most enquiring and lateral minds are really employed at the customer inetrafce or public entry of an organisation.

This enhances the game for the new activist. Most often the trail and clues are oblique. They may work through others, people you know of and meet. They may use institutions, media and a myriad of networks.

Most people working in their targeted environments are oblivious to their coming and going or may simply dismiss them at first glance. Sometimes those in charge will rationalise why something went wrong, based on their understanding, experience and perceptions. They get reinforcement from their peers and justify their failures. One reason that so many get it wrong is that "comprehensive and deep intelligence gathering" about their working environment and the world in which resides is not a serious endeavour, within the enterprise. They are limited by their own imagination. The
experts, no matter the field of endeavour never seem to learn. Probably because they are not required to engage in life long learning. How many organisation are really learning organisations? As they say, ignorance is bliss. The architect of these "game plays" tends to move quickly, across boundaries, nearly always in the background and beyond sight and awareness. They are not shackled by the need to get approvals and await decisions. They communicate directly to audiences within the enterprises or within the communities with which the enterprise deals. They may go wider than that. The content of those communications, and interactions, vary. For example even as employees of a major Queensland based billion dollar enterprise travelled the world seeking investment, finance and contracts, competing interests shadowed them. The task of the "shadowers" was to level the playing field for a small competitor to the billion dollar enterprise. It was also to compete in every conceivable manner. They will enact their strategies across Australia and globally, electronically and in person, as necessary.

They are watching how you
behave what standards and role models you exhibit. They are examining your modus operandi for commercial and/or competitive reasons. They use the very tools that the professionals, governments, industry and opinion shapers use. They will communicate, as they see fit and for their purposes, to narrow or ever widening audience. They will distribute material them well beyond the circulation of in house media and corporate relations practitioners, and individual media publications.



There is a steep learning curve for employees, politicians, corporate managers, board members and others before they come to realise that technology has opened up a complex web of influence and action, that never existed before. The ability to glean information from multiple sources is extraordinary.

A new breed of activists and professional strategists, operate beyond their horizons and awareness. These are not traditional activists and professionals. They are mixing work and personal interests and using the web as a means to broaden their strategies and actions. They may be in the background, interacting with, advising or working with, the people you see in the front line. They level the playing field for smaller enterprises and for interest groups, communities and individuals. They may cause resources, and attention, to be expended in countering or dealing with their activity, complicating the planning and objectives in your work or other environments.

It appears that many board members, employees, advisers and decision makers do not engage themselves, or their organisations, in intelligence gathering and lateral thinking as to who their competing interests might be. Often the best employees are not placed in the front line. They have little concept of the complex interactions of their work environment and have little idea of the background of the people with which they are dealing on a daily basis.

Unexpectedly someone takes an interest in their sphere of activity and engages the organisation, enterprise or agency, using "machine and human networks". The more astute minded of our corporations are hiring such skilled practitioners to operate in the background, complicating their competitors' world along with that of governments, agencies and politicians.

The real danger to the status quo and their objectives might be the individual who decides to enter the sphere to test their abilities. They challenge themselves in a type of David and Goliath battle, coming out of left field to play in the big game, unexpectedly to see what impact they can have.


Technology puts a power in the hands of the individual as never before. There is more material being distributed to members of Australia's governments, media, the broader community and onto the world wide web. There are patterns, and purposes, in some of this activity. The best laid plans of mice, and men, can be supported, confounded, exposed or defeated by a strategist using human and machine tools. Awareness of external forces is not a forte of the greater part of the workforce. This web site, and its content, and the Mosaic Portal design is a deliberate use of technology for a purpose. No corporation, government, institution or individual is beyond reach or impact.






A deep extended index of subjects and subtopics where the research, and search, has been done to find sites with news, articles and resources about your work, study, family, lifestyle, interests, hobbies, entertainment, beliefs, and much, much more.

The Mosaic Portal


The Mosaic Portal web site index The Mosaic Portal multiple web site index

a most informative, and deep index, of topics covering the latest news about your work, profession, hobby or interests.

This utility scours the web to eliminate the tiresome irrelevancies of a general web search and arranges the information into specific categories and sub indexes.