|
FOR IMPACT DELIVERY WITHIN THE LEGAL BOUNDARIES OF POLITICAL, AND CORPORATE, ACTIVISM DEVELOPED, AND HONED, OVER YEARS - CONTINUOUSLY DESIGNING, AND IMPLEMENTING, TARGETED CAMPAIGNS AND STRATEGIES CREATING REACTION AND INFLUENCING OUTCOMES Through the application, and implementation, of game theory LATERAL THINKING AND STRATEGY KEVIN R BECK's Mosaic Portal Network |
|
|
|
|
|
This modelling of game theory, in appication, intermeshes into a complexity, beyond the horizon. The web sites of the Mosaic Portal often point to actions, have opinion pieces or actually state what is happening or going to happen, giving clues. When read in part or whole they describe a mosaic of deliberate activity, and application, of the mind. They tell of events, and things, that media commentators, business people, boards, politicians and bureaucrats have totally misconceived, assumed to be the work of others. They have no as to the real facts, or the out of sight involvement, of others. Who did them, how they did them or why they did them? These activities, objectives and initiatives are applied to governments, individual politicians, political parties, individual businesses and sometimes individuals. The activities, and impacts, set in train are local, regional, national and international. ,br> You merely have to visit the web sites, the forums and the links in order to discover what the Mosaic really is all about. The game theory described here is the everyday life of the owner, and others. It is in many ways the creation, and deployment, of the mind. |
|
|
|
The principles of activism outlined here adopt many styles including the commercial business approach. If we do not get a reaction initially we will persist and broaden the strategy. |
| What is the dance? | Creating the strategy elements | Things to consider | Players | Want a strategist? |
|
IMPORTANT
every portal page uses scripting to update content.
So turn your active content on.
|
![]()
Click on image
Climate change theory, an imprecise set of scientific arguments is driving the labor government policy. But not to care, the government is happy to alows pin and untruths to serve their agenda and purpose. So let is practice it back at them. This policy is deeply flawed and based on propositions that are not true, or are manipulated, to create and justify the outcome, the government wants. There is nothing wrong with reducing carbon emissions to clean the environment but an ETS is not necessarily the bst way to go about it. The public service is not doing its job. The parliament is not doing its job and will be galvanised, firstly through the demotion of Malcolm Turnbull, in late 2009, and then via a set of carefully planned and implemented strategies in 2010. Additional ammmunition will be provided to the opponents, of the ETS, and the government will be thwarted in its objectives. Kevin Rudd is effectively gaming the nation's futrure on an ideological belief. If Kevin Rudd and the labor party in Australia's federal government go ahead with their planned carbon reduction scheme (ETS) scheduled for 2010 they will wreck Australia's economy and leave a mark more indelible than the recession Australia had to have under former labor Prime Minister, Paul Keating.
Archive article: The seeds of Rudd's climate change debacle. Brendan Nelson, may be a bumbling liberal party leader but essentially he is right in trying to preach caution and block labor's moves. Rudd's team are the sheep, following the latest fad, at the front of the pack who will blindly run over the cliff taking the gullible voters with them. Every crack pot theory and activist is now given oxygen, and the debate is clowded and we cannot hold the government to a serious accontable debate. It is now imperative, as never before, that those with the capacity to resist, and block, engage Kevin Rudd and the labor government, the Greens and the greenies, and ideologs, in a war of attrition like no other ever seen in the nation before. This is not about politics and simple resistance or activism. This is about survival economically and socially, defying the efforts, and actions, of people who colllectively have never created anything. They are theorists and academics. politicians of zeal and ideology whose beliefs, and passions, are extremely dangerous. Out to save a world that does not need saving. They are not experts, in any shape or form, and they have never accurately predicted anything. They have at their disposal a public service, detached from reality, commissioned to serve. This public service is imbued with the code of serving the government of the day without question. They serve Ministers whose backgrounds, experiences and credentials, are not diverzse and congisant of the peril to whihc they are takin g us. We must draw on our own experiences and resources to resist, block and if necessary destroy their resolve and strategies. If the Rudd labor government spends a million or more on advertising their view points about the ETS (carbon reduction) then they should also fund counter opinions in the interest of the nation. |
|
|
|
|
Every day content seekers, and agents, enter the Mosaic Portal web sites extracting materials for distribution, for use in their own content, for educational and research purposes and much more. This content, provided free of charge to users, is posted on web sites and into hard print media articles and press releases, and is used in targeted mass circulation emails, and campaigns, in Australia, in the United States and sometimes internationally. A multipath communication network is being established, maintained and expanded. This, and other motivations, mesh to create the catalyst for the dance. Today ()2009) there are new paradigms affecting the world of politics, government and business. Here there are lessons for others. The dance upon which lateral thinkers can take organisations (public and private) or individuals is quite dramatic and often unexpected. Take for example this case: "Australian Paralympian 'dragged himself on to plane after forced to check in wheelchair' Australian Paralympic champion Kurt Fearnley has received an apology from the budget airline Jetstar after staff removed his wheelchair forcing him to drag himself across the floor of a busy airport. The 28-year-old, who won the marathon gold at both the Athens and Beijing games, hauled himself through Brisbane Airport and onto the plane when the company – an offshoot of the Australian flag carrier Qantas – said his specially adapted wheelchair had to be checked into the hold. Fearnley, who had just completed a gruelling 60 mile trek through the Papua New Guinea jungle, was offered the use of an airline wheelchair, but refused claiming it was an insult to his independence." (Source: By Martin Evans Published: 9:13PM GMT 25 Nov 2009, UK Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/6654946/Australian-Paralympian-dragged-himself-on-to-plane-after-forced-to-check-in-wheelchair.html) The Jetstar management failure to have a relevant anticipatory policy in place, and the action of the relevant employee, no doubt did not anticipate the fallout as Mr Furnley contacted the Australian media. This story went wrldwide on the internet. An individual can create an email alert off this topic using Google tools - allowing a person to monitor every reportage of this incidence anywhere in the world and use that documentation to further an issue - http://www.google.com.au/alerts?um=1&cf=all&ned=au&hl=en&q=kokoda+wheelchair+Jet+star&t=1&source=news&cd=2) The archilles heel of many corporations is the attitude of their employees that the employer's systems and procedures take precedence over all else. The changed dynamics, due to technology access in the hands of the individual and the group, has been extensively reported in the media, in parliaments and has been the product of discussions in many board rooms for many, many years. However, quite often, the journalists, commentators and the advisers and consultants have no idea who plays beyond their horizons. They have no idea that strategies put in place several years ago are now active and in play. Many different strategies across many parts of industry and society. Everyday more are being created and put into play. Contact our multiskilled talented professionals to discuss services, campaigns, assignments and business. Not everything people do is work related. Some of it has public, and community, interest, some things they undertake to see if they can reach into governments, business and enterprises, anywhere. Some things I do because I am motivated. Maybe they want to challenge other's abilities, to create a high stakes game. |
|
The application of game theory to industry, to business, to competition, activism and interest using the tools, and resources, of the ![]()
Privacy Statement, Uses and Motivation How many people will we send stuff to, communicate or interact with, today or tomorrow? |
|
IMPORTANT
every portal page uses scripting to update content.
So turn your active content on.
|
|
|
|
The Dance is what I call a game play orchestrated in a particular arena of activity - political, government, corporate and/or community. It is when The dance comes about when someone takes a company, an executive, a bureaucrat or other person and directly, or indirectly, deposits them (metaphorically speaking) into a complex problem or within the hornet's nest of a political environment, inside a contrived, or existing, public issue or a sensitive and charged emotive environment. " Grech's torrent of gushing advice to Turnbull JACOB SAULWICK NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT, November 26, 2009 GODWIN GRECH was attempting to collude on fees paid to an investment banker, while styling himself as an intimate adviser to the Liberal leader, Malcolm Turnbull. A report into the so-called ''Utegate'' affair outlines extensive links between Mr Grech and Mr Turnbull, John Howard's former chief of staff Arthur Sinodinos, and also John O'Sullivan, the head of investment banking at Credit Suisse and the husband of The Australian's Janet Albrechtsen. The report shows Malcolm Turnbull made contact at least 30 times with Mr Grech, a man who referred to Barack Obama as ''the Black Jesus'', described Treasury as ''left-wing loony,'' and offered numerous column ideas to Ms Albrechtsen. There were at least 22 emails and eight phone calls or messages between Mr Grech and Mr Turnbull from November 2008 to late June 2009. There were another 88 email exchanges with other senior Liberal identities from September 2008, according to the Senate privileges committee report, tabled last night in Parliament.(Source: Sydney Morning Herald, http://www.smh.com.au/national/grechs-torrent-of-gushing-advice-to-turnbull-20091125-jrwi.html) The outcome effect is that an organisation's management's attention and resources, is extensively diverted. This is effectively what happened in the Godwin Grech case. There are other examples. Hetty Johnston, living in Australia, deposited the artist Bill Henson, the NSW Police Service, the Premier of NSW and the Prime Minister of Australia in a political, and community, hornets nest over Bill Henson's pictures, of naked young girls and boys. It may be a diversion or focused, deliberate impact seeking an outcome. Ms Johnston is adept at the very technqiues described in this web site. In being adept she herself, and her group, become a useful utility. Another example of the dance is the political activist group Get Up. Though they have lesss impact. The Dance is a set of strategies for subjecting politicians in their daily activity, or in elections to specific exposure. It is also used to subject corporate executives to external forces and interactions or to exert pressure on politicians. Get Up (http://www.getup.org.au/) is one such example where like minded participants use high technology to give effect. In the world of governments, people tend to think conventionally and say "they will give their vote to someone else" in the next election. This is largely meaningless to a politician unless you can actually unseat the incumbent. One has to reach much wider. If you want to bring down a business venture then you may have to blend a whole mosaic. "Plans to build magnesium smelter in Qld on verge of collapse" - The World Today - Tuesday, 27 May , 2003 Reporter: Louise Willis HAMISH ROBERTSON: Plans to build a $1.5 billion magnesium smelter in Central Queensland are again on the verge of collapse. Only last year, the project's owners, Australian Magnesium Corporation, managed to prop up their decade-old development proposal with a $300 million injection from the Queensland and Federal Governments. But now, as Louise Willis reports, the AMC says it needs a new financial backer for the project to survive. LOUISE WILLIS: When first unveiled, the AMC magnesium project was hailed as an enormous economic shot in the arm for Central Queensland, not to mention Australia. But recently the project has been plagued by financial worries. Two years ago AMC failed to raise the $650 million initially needed to construct the smelter. Last year, the Queensland and Federal Governments each offered $150 million, claiming it was vital the project proceed. This year, AMC has admitted major cost over-runs, and Australia's corporate watchdog – the Australian Securities Commission – is looking into the matter. The company now admits it needs more help to survive." (Source: ABC The World Today) The compay did not survive the competitor's hit. The politicians, the community and the corporation's executives, had been taken on a merry dance across Australia and the world. Vested interests, the banks sealed the fate. Who influenced their decision against the wishes, collective might and wisdomn, and economic claims of all of the powerful supporters? In 1997 the Minister for Education, Senator Amanda Vanstone, was embroiled in a scandal where some $A2,200,000 of government funds were put at risk by her department. There was a Senate enquiry and court cases. The Senator unfortunatley was a political casualty. Who orchestrated her dance card and the strategy elements? Who recovered $A1,75087,000 of the money that the private recipients of grants took off the Department? Between the years 1991 - 1994 the State Electricity Commission of Victoria was privatised in an environment of political and union opposition. One union, the Australia Services Union Energy Branch, was instrumental in devlivering the outcomes. Why did this union branch stand out from twenty three other unions in the state? Who orchestrated the dance card? The strategy, and its unit elements, is reported in parliamentary records and media archives. Who can have a major supermarket raided by food and regulatory inspectors? Who can influence a Senate enquiry into telecommunications, and the objectives of Telstra or Optus, and how is this done? What else can be orchestrated by knowlegeable, and creative, people? ![]() |
|
The techniques, and plans, are deployed internally within an organisation or system, externally or both, concurrently. They are employed internally by communicating to the Board, the management, a regulatory body or some other person or entity that has influence inside the organisatioon or the target's world of work and interest. A public, consumer, media, board, management, political or other focus is brought to bear on individuaols within an entity. It may include analysis and research. It might include distributing economic or social evaluation papers critiquing the performance or activity of the person or organisation. Distribution of these papers goes to interested parties such as banks, financiers, legislators, the media etc. This activity forms a mosaic, a complex strategy. Some practitioners earn their livelihood from creating and implementing the dance, others do it for a hobby and for fun and some do it for the public interest. They might do it to level the playing field in an environment where people are facing a greater resourced and ruthless competitive enterprise or a stubborn bureaucracy. The tactic is to attach responsibility, accountability or perceived negative outcomes to the person's work environment. The modern executive, politician and bureaucrat, likes to avoid accountability and likes to deflect to someone else. The person in charge usually does not like unexpected intrusions into their world of work and fiefdoms or questions and challenges to their authority or personal esteem and self image. Of course some are so bound up in their own world that they cannot see the nose on their face until it bites. In the KEVINRBECK Mosaic Portal reside numerous examples, and demonstrations, of all of the above motivations. You just have to look for them. If I pointed to all of them that would be too easy. Deep inside their shiny headquarters the management, and advisers, of Australia's major corporate, and public sector, enterprises plan and execute their elaborate strategies. They tell their boards, shareholders and customers, governments and the general public how good their strategies are and what the future will be. |
|
|
|
|
|
SOME VEHICLES Technology is empowering. It enables individuals, and interest groups, to find, and reach, the same audiences that are the executives within, the targets of politicians, corporations, enterprise and small business and the constituents.
|